Uber, Delusion, In Addition To Ride-Hailing's Structural Economical Inefficiency
May 13, 2019
Edit
Uber's much-anticipated IPO occurred on Friday, together with to the surprise of almost no ane (sensible), the stock ended the session downwards 7% (despite the offering having already been priced at a discount to initial ambitions, afterward Lyft's weak post-IPO showing). In my view, the stock probable has much farther to fall, together with inward many respects the Uber story is the perfect exemplar of this cycle's excesses.
The most extraordinary thing well-nigh Uber is that despite all the hype together with putative 'wealth creation' it has generated to date, which has propelled its valuation to some US$80bn - since it's founding the companionship has done aught but sack copious amounts of cash, together with is yet to bear witness it fifty-fifty has a feasible describe organization model. The companionship is currently losing US$3-4bn a yr on US$11bn inward revenue, together with revenue growth is already sharply slowing (already downwards to the teens YoY, together with relatively apartment sequentially).
In gild to deflect attending from its unflattering financials together with slowing growth, the companionship has tried to sell investors on the thought that an investment inward Uber is an investment inward the 'future of mobility'. The companionship envisages a Blue Planet where individual vehicle ownership ceases, together with people simply job ride-hailing for their shipping needs - i.e. 'transportation every bit a service' (TaaS). However, this vision of the futurity ignores the inconvenient economical realities discussed below, which are already patently evident inward the company's substantial operating losses, together with worse, for the techno-optimists, the coming arrival of total vehicle autonomy (self-driving cars) is genuinely an existential threat to whatever balance of a feasible describe organization model does currently exist. Far from beingness the futurity of mobility, Uber is genuinely on the evening of beingness technologically disrupted. Uber investors are genuinely going curt the truthful futurity of mobility.
The bulls believe that Uber's electrical flow losses reverberate an inefficient grade of scale. Given the economical realities I utter over below, at that spot is genuinely a expert remove a opportunity that the truth is the contrary - inward gild for Uber to survive, it volition demand to shrink to profitability. As I discuss, at that spot are potentially profitable niche applications for Uber, but whatsoever attempts at the mass-market domination of individual shipping are probable to exclusively live met alongside (and indeed receive got been met with) mushrooming losses. Ultimately, Uber may bear witness to live worth exclusively a handful of billions (>90% less than it's electrical flow valuation), every bit it profitably services a few niche markets, but at depression margins, due to vigorous competition, upward until total vehicle autonomy arrives, inward which example at that spot is a expert remove a opportunity the companionship volition live release of business.
So what are these economical realities I speak of, together with why don't ride-hailing economic science stack up? Let's offset consider nutrient delivery, which does build economical sense. If I desire to gild nutrient from given location X, it is to a greater extent than economically efficient that a driver already inward unopen proximity to the eating seat heads to the eating seat to pick upward my food, together with and so delivers it to me. The total go fourth dimension involved powerfulness be, say, v minutes for the driver to caput to the restaurant, together with and so fifteen minutes from the eating seat to my house, whereas if I was to choke together with pick the nutrient upward myself, it would involve a thirty infinitesimal circular trip.
The aggregate grade of human shipping labour involved is thus xx minutes instead of thirty minutes. This creates a meaningful labour-saving gain from outsourcing. Restaurants also receive got economies of scale inward element procurement together with cooking, together with it is thus economically rational for nutrient training to live outsourced. Food delivery is thus a rational economical service. Perhaps for this reason, at that spot are currently profitable food-delivery companies - albeit that turn a profit margins are real thin, every bit the service is commoditized together with like shooting fish in a barrel to replicate, together with barriers to entry are low.
However, the economic science of ride-hailing are different. If I desire to choke from A to B, I tin john drive myself, together with it powerfulness convey order fifteen minutes. However, if I hail a car, it may convey v minutes for the auto to go from the hailing indicate to my location, increasing the grade of driver labour to xx minutes. However, it gets much worse, because the existent total is 35 minutes, because I soundless demand to sit down inward the auto for fifteen minutes spell I'm beingness driven, together with thus contribute an additional fifteen minutes of 'commuting labour' (particularly because reading/working inward a auto every bit a rider is nausea-inducing, together with both drivers together with passengers tin john hear to the radio/music/podcasts). A amount total of 35 minutes of human fourth dimension are at nowadays demand to ferry me from A to B, instead of fifteen minutes, which is an extremely wasteful undertaking, together with loss of aggregate efficiency/productivity for the economy.
This is the centre argue why individual auto ownership together with performance has ever been the primary agency past times which people receive got commuted past times automobile, instead of the entire manufacture having teach dominated past times outsourced individual taxis. On describe organization human relationship of their structurally higher economical cost, the latter receive got had to confine themselves to niche applications, such every bit ferrying people to together with from the airport; providing curt distance commutes inward CBD areas where parking is expensive together with scarce (e.g. inward NYC); together with transporting intoxicated drivers home.
Labour is expensive, together with few people are both willing together with able to afford to pay someone $10-15 an lx minutes to drive them some when they tin john easily practise it themselves, at no additional personal fourth dimension cost. Private chauffeurs are rare for the same argue individual cooks together with individual butlers are. It's an economically inefficient/wasteful job of human labour, together with past times Definition exclusively the rich volition ever live able to afford to hire such people, because it's a fallacy of composition to believe nosotros tin john all receive got individual 'help'. Uber's mass-market ride-hailing ambitions are thus completely unrealistic.
Furthermore, it was reported inward this morning's WSJ that at that spot receive got late been widespread protests past times Uber drivers, bemoaning depression wages. In the US, some drivers build every bit lilliputian every bit $5 an hour, together with the bulk no to a greater extent than than low-teens - at or fifty-fifty below the minimum wage inward many U.S.A. markets, despite foregoing many mandated employee benefits (as they operate every bit outsourced contractors). Already, Uber's drivers are earning uneconomically depression reward (and thereby providing a important labour cost subsidy), the yet the companionship is soundless absorbing real important operating losses. And despite the companionship providing an additional 'company subsidy' of US$3-4bn a yr (operating losses) to customers, on US$11bn inward revenue, the company's top-line growth is already radically slowing, despite Uber having exclusively tapped a tiny fraction of the putative total addressable marketplace seat it is targeting.
These outcomes - along alongside the fact that Uber has had to absorb mountainous losses inward gild to grow over the years - are like shooting fish in a barrel understood when these economical realities are considered: Because ride-hailing is structurally economically inefficient, the exclusively way the companionship is able to generate mass-market demand for their services is past times underpaying drivers together with underpricing its services (the service is probable well-nigh 30% underpriced at acquaint - that is to order prices demand to live raised past times well-nigh 50% - if ane considers the hikes that would live required both to pay drivers sustainable reward together with build a low-single-digit positive operating margin). They receive got compensated for the structural economical inefficiency past times non pricing that inefficiency into the cost of their services.
The interrogation is, what would demand expect similar if they raised prices 50%? The response is, many of their electrical flow customers would belike halt using the service, or job it much less frequently. But if revenues started to decline, it would bust the growth narrative, together with the company's valuation would collapse. This explains why the companionship has continued to lose copious amounts of coin - at that spot has been no other way for them to keep the illusion of this beingness a viable, high-growth tech company, together with thereby proceed to inflate the valuation. Uber has tried to reign inward losses some over the past times few years, to teach the companionship 'IPO ready', but receive got by together with large succeeded inward only slowing top-line growth together with stabilising losses at a soundless extraordinary-high level.
Is at that spot soundless a identify inward the Blue Planet for Uber? In the medium term, probable yes. Certainly, the service is much ameliorate than conventional taxis inward the pre-Uber world, together with despite their high cost, the Blue Planet has needed taxes for niche applications for decades. The highest value-add is inward highly built-up areas alongside limited parking availability - the powerfulness to avoid both the fourth dimension together with cost of looking for parking is a meaningful economical gain from taxies/ride-hailing. So at that spot is definitely room for an Uber type service.
However, NYC together with Silicon Valley based investors forget that the bulk of the Blue Planet doesn't alive inward these areas, and Uber is radically overestimating the size of its economically addressable market. Most people alive inward suburbia, where it is like shooting fish in a barrel to commute to function together with where at that spot is ample, gratis together with convenient parking available. I'm reminded every fourth dimension I choke dorsum to New Zealand to pass fourth dimension alongside my parents that individual vehicle ownership isn't going to cease whatsoever fourth dimension soon. Commuting alongside one's ain auto is cheap, reliable, fast, together with comfortable. Why hold off some for an expensive Uber when y'all tin john exactly whip yourself downwards the route to the local shop or eating seat inward v minutes, together with common for gratis exterior on the route or inward designated parking areas outside?
To what extent it volition live Uber ultimately providing these niche services is also unclear. Uber sure had an initial atomic number 82 inward technology, but traditional taxi companies receive got at nowadays had ample fourth dimension to prepare their ain online apps alongside comparable services, together with receive got also had to bring down prices. When Uber increases its prices to to a greater extent than economical levels, traditional taxi companies volition live inward a strong seat to defend their businesses together with struggle back. Many other local together with international ride-hailing competitors receive got also emerged together with replicated Uber's client value proposition. Uber originally had a technological lead, but has at nowadays lost it, together with inward capitalism, it doesn't affair how much you've innovated together with improved the Blue Planet if other people tin john easily re-create you.
Uber also has a real limited 'network' effect, because drivers tin john together with practise bound to whatever platform offers them the best terms - indeed most Uber drivers job all available platforms, together with they receive got rides from the platform offering them the highest rates - together with customers tin john practise the same (most customers receive got multiple ride-hailing apps on the phones, together with tin john easily select the cheapest). This agency that fifty-fifty if Uber survives, it volition probable ever stay an extremely depression margin business.
Uber's vision of beingness the globally dominant build for ride-hailing has also already been quashed. In many markets they were outcompeted past times to a greater extent than nimble together with aggressive local competitors, which has forced Uber to merge and/or teach out many markets (they no longer be inward Singapore/South East Asia, for instance, having been forced to merge alongside local competitor Grab, which is the surviving brand, inward telephone substitution for a minority stake; the same occurred inward Red People's Republic of China alongside Didi). Given this pronounced forced retreat inward the company's global ambitions - essentially the early on adoption of the 'shrink to profitability' strategy mentioned before - it is remarkable the company's individual marketplace seat valuation doubled in ane lawsuit to a greater extent than during this menses - a truthful testament to the extent of the electrical flow VC-funded tech bubble.
Uber tin john belike survive, but it volition probable demand to significantly shrink the size together with breadth of its operations downwards to a few profitable centre niches/markets (a strategy the companionship has already commenced), together with it may ultimately terminate upward beingness worth exclusively a handful of billions of dollars, every bit the companionship operates a depression margin describe organization on a much smaller addressable market, where it also needs to fence alongside many other vigorous competitors, including non exclusively other ride-sharing apps, but also newly-energized traditional taxi companies.
All this is - all the same - before considering the potentially devastating number the arrival of total vehicle autonomy volition receive got on Uber's business. The delusional Masayoshi Son has invested aggressively inward Uber together with sees it every bit purpose of his vision of participating inward the coming technological singularity, but the truth is that Uber belike won't fifty-fifty hold upward the transition to autonomous cars, allow lonely the singularity (the latter of which is also some other delusion, reflecting widespread technological hubris together with "Moore's Curse" - the inappropriate job of the analogy of rising transistor density to typify coming exponential progress inward other areas).
Many many well-resourced organisations are working on developing total vehicle autonomy, together with it is most unlikely Uber volition live the offset past times the post. And whoever develops the engineering scientific discipline offset volition live able to offering a much to a greater extent than affordable fleet of fully-autonomous ride-hailing vehicles, bankrupting human-based ride-sharing platforms. Furthermore, fifty-fifty if Uber did orbit off to live first, longer term at that spot volition live many providers of autonomous fleets operating the same commoditized service, where the exclusively entry barrier is working capital missive of the alphabet (how many cars practise y'all desire to fund into a fleet inward a given location). It's probable to resultant inward an extremely working capital missive of the alphabet intensive, highly competitive together with depression profitability industry.
Furthermore, if your ain individual auto tin john autonomously drive y'all to together with from your destination, together with afterward dropping y'all past times the door, tin john choke together with common itself, at that spot is lilliputian value-add provided past times ride-hailing at all - y'all tin john exactly job your ain car, fifty-fifty if you're intoxicated (the latter characteristic volition probable significantly bring down demand for taxis/ride-hailing, every bit this is a fundamental job case). Why hold off for someone else's car, when y'all tin john teach out at in ane lawsuit inward your own, the model of which y'all tin john select to stand upward for your ain preferences alongside abide by to comfort, style, size, safety, performance, together with cost. Personal cars receive got been used for a real long fourth dimension every bit an seem of personal identity, every bit good every bit to demo off wealth together with status, together with at that spot is a expert remove a opportunity that continues, together with indeed makes a resurgence in ane lawsuit cars are fully autonomous (much has been made of Millennials comprehend of ride-hailing together with eschewing individual vehicle ownership, but a lot of this reflects the high cost of individual vehicle ownership for cash-strapped Millennials, together with the cost together with hassle of obtaining drivers' licenses).
How this all shakes out remains to live seen, but it is far from clear Uber volition hold upward this transition at all (although I tend to believe total autonomy is much farther off than the engineering scientific discipline bulls believe - belike at to the lowest degree a decade). And depending on the stride of development, Uber may non fifty-fifty succeed inward making a turn a profit before this indicate arrives, which agency that it may non succeed inward ever making a profit, period.
Uber is an extraordinary testament to the grade of delusion together with sheer irrationality that currently exists inward the Blue Planet of privately-funded tech. At this point, the extent of the irrational exuberance is real much approaching the grade of the dot.com mania. The post-IPO sell-offs inward Uber together with Lyft volition no uncertainty live ascribed to the 'short sightedness' of populace markets, but the truth is that fifty-fifty inward their electrical flow dry ground of infatuation alongside high-growth tech companies, populace markets are soundless to a greater extent than rational than individual tech markets, together with that is why the stocks are falling. A reckoning is coming inward the individual tech market, together with the rush of tech IPOs this yr suggests the tipping indicate may good live nigh.
Uber looks to live a fairly obvious curt to me.
LT3000
The most extraordinary thing well-nigh Uber is that despite all the hype together with putative 'wealth creation' it has generated to date, which has propelled its valuation to some US$80bn - since it's founding the companionship has done aught but sack copious amounts of cash, together with is yet to bear witness it fifty-fifty has a feasible describe organization model. The companionship is currently losing US$3-4bn a yr on US$11bn inward revenue, together with revenue growth is already sharply slowing (already downwards to the teens YoY, together with relatively apartment sequentially).
In gild to deflect attending from its unflattering financials together with slowing growth, the companionship has tried to sell investors on the thought that an investment inward Uber is an investment inward the 'future of mobility'. The companionship envisages a Blue Planet where individual vehicle ownership ceases, together with people simply job ride-hailing for their shipping needs - i.e. 'transportation every bit a service' (TaaS). However, this vision of the futurity ignores the inconvenient economical realities discussed below, which are already patently evident inward the company's substantial operating losses, together with worse, for the techno-optimists, the coming arrival of total vehicle autonomy (self-driving cars) is genuinely an existential threat to whatever balance of a feasible describe organization model does currently exist. Far from beingness the futurity of mobility, Uber is genuinely on the evening of beingness technologically disrupted. Uber investors are genuinely going curt the truthful futurity of mobility.
The bulls believe that Uber's electrical flow losses reverberate an inefficient grade of scale. Given the economical realities I utter over below, at that spot is genuinely a expert remove a opportunity that the truth is the contrary - inward gild for Uber to survive, it volition demand to shrink to profitability. As I discuss, at that spot are potentially profitable niche applications for Uber, but whatsoever attempts at the mass-market domination of individual shipping are probable to exclusively live met alongside (and indeed receive got been met with) mushrooming losses. Ultimately, Uber may bear witness to live worth exclusively a handful of billions (>90% less than it's electrical flow valuation), every bit it profitably services a few niche markets, but at depression margins, due to vigorous competition, upward until total vehicle autonomy arrives, inward which example at that spot is a expert remove a opportunity the companionship volition live release of business.
So what are these economical realities I speak of, together with why don't ride-hailing economic science stack up? Let's offset consider nutrient delivery, which does build economical sense. If I desire to gild nutrient from given location X, it is to a greater extent than economically efficient that a driver already inward unopen proximity to the eating seat heads to the eating seat to pick upward my food, together with and so delivers it to me. The total go fourth dimension involved powerfulness be, say, v minutes for the driver to caput to the restaurant, together with and so fifteen minutes from the eating seat to my house, whereas if I was to choke together with pick the nutrient upward myself, it would involve a thirty infinitesimal circular trip.
The aggregate grade of human shipping labour involved is thus xx minutes instead of thirty minutes. This creates a meaningful labour-saving gain from outsourcing. Restaurants also receive got economies of scale inward element procurement together with cooking, together with it is thus economically rational for nutrient training to live outsourced. Food delivery is thus a rational economical service. Perhaps for this reason, at that spot are currently profitable food-delivery companies - albeit that turn a profit margins are real thin, every bit the service is commoditized together with like shooting fish in a barrel to replicate, together with barriers to entry are low.
However, the economic science of ride-hailing are different. If I desire to choke from A to B, I tin john drive myself, together with it powerfulness convey order fifteen minutes. However, if I hail a car, it may convey v minutes for the auto to go from the hailing indicate to my location, increasing the grade of driver labour to xx minutes. However, it gets much worse, because the existent total is 35 minutes, because I soundless demand to sit down inward the auto for fifteen minutes spell I'm beingness driven, together with thus contribute an additional fifteen minutes of 'commuting labour' (particularly because reading/working inward a auto every bit a rider is nausea-inducing, together with both drivers together with passengers tin john hear to the radio/music/podcasts). A amount total of 35 minutes of human fourth dimension are at nowadays demand to ferry me from A to B, instead of fifteen minutes, which is an extremely wasteful undertaking, together with loss of aggregate efficiency/productivity for the economy.
This is the centre argue why individual auto ownership together with performance has ever been the primary agency past times which people receive got commuted past times automobile, instead of the entire manufacture having teach dominated past times outsourced individual taxis. On describe organization human relationship of their structurally higher economical cost, the latter receive got had to confine themselves to niche applications, such every bit ferrying people to together with from the airport; providing curt distance commutes inward CBD areas where parking is expensive together with scarce (e.g. inward NYC); together with transporting intoxicated drivers home.
Labour is expensive, together with few people are both willing together with able to afford to pay someone $10-15 an lx minutes to drive them some when they tin john easily practise it themselves, at no additional personal fourth dimension cost. Private chauffeurs are rare for the same argue individual cooks together with individual butlers are. It's an economically inefficient/wasteful job of human labour, together with past times Definition exclusively the rich volition ever live able to afford to hire such people, because it's a fallacy of composition to believe nosotros tin john all receive got individual 'help'. Uber's mass-market ride-hailing ambitions are thus completely unrealistic.
Furthermore, it was reported inward this morning's WSJ that at that spot receive got late been widespread protests past times Uber drivers, bemoaning depression wages. In the US, some drivers build every bit lilliputian every bit $5 an hour, together with the bulk no to a greater extent than than low-teens - at or fifty-fifty below the minimum wage inward many U.S.A. markets, despite foregoing many mandated employee benefits (as they operate every bit outsourced contractors). Already, Uber's drivers are earning uneconomically depression reward (and thereby providing a important labour cost subsidy), the yet the companionship is soundless absorbing real important operating losses. And despite the companionship providing an additional 'company subsidy' of US$3-4bn a yr (operating losses) to customers, on US$11bn inward revenue, the company's top-line growth is already radically slowing, despite Uber having exclusively tapped a tiny fraction of the putative total addressable marketplace seat it is targeting.
These outcomes - along alongside the fact that Uber has had to absorb mountainous losses inward gild to grow over the years - are like shooting fish in a barrel understood when these economical realities are considered: Because ride-hailing is structurally economically inefficient, the exclusively way the companionship is able to generate mass-market demand for their services is past times underpaying drivers together with underpricing its services (the service is probable well-nigh 30% underpriced at acquaint - that is to order prices demand to live raised past times well-nigh 50% - if ane considers the hikes that would live required both to pay drivers sustainable reward together with build a low-single-digit positive operating margin). They receive got compensated for the structural economical inefficiency past times non pricing that inefficiency into the cost of their services.
The interrogation is, what would demand expect similar if they raised prices 50%? The response is, many of their electrical flow customers would belike halt using the service, or job it much less frequently. But if revenues started to decline, it would bust the growth narrative, together with the company's valuation would collapse. This explains why the companionship has continued to lose copious amounts of coin - at that spot has been no other way for them to keep the illusion of this beingness a viable, high-growth tech company, together with thereby proceed to inflate the valuation. Uber has tried to reign inward losses some over the past times few years, to teach the companionship 'IPO ready', but receive got by together with large succeeded inward only slowing top-line growth together with stabilising losses at a soundless extraordinary-high level.
Is at that spot soundless a identify inward the Blue Planet for Uber? In the medium term, probable yes. Certainly, the service is much ameliorate than conventional taxis inward the pre-Uber world, together with despite their high cost, the Blue Planet has needed taxes for niche applications for decades. The highest value-add is inward highly built-up areas alongside limited parking availability - the powerfulness to avoid both the fourth dimension together with cost of looking for parking is a meaningful economical gain from taxies/ride-hailing. So at that spot is definitely room for an Uber type service.
However, NYC together with Silicon Valley based investors forget that the bulk of the Blue Planet doesn't alive inward these areas, and Uber is radically overestimating the size of its economically addressable market. Most people alive inward suburbia, where it is like shooting fish in a barrel to commute to function together with where at that spot is ample, gratis together with convenient parking available. I'm reminded every fourth dimension I choke dorsum to New Zealand to pass fourth dimension alongside my parents that individual vehicle ownership isn't going to cease whatsoever fourth dimension soon. Commuting alongside one's ain auto is cheap, reliable, fast, together with comfortable. Why hold off some for an expensive Uber when y'all tin john exactly whip yourself downwards the route to the local shop or eating seat inward v minutes, together with common for gratis exterior on the route or inward designated parking areas outside?
To what extent it volition live Uber ultimately providing these niche services is also unclear. Uber sure had an initial atomic number 82 inward technology, but traditional taxi companies receive got at nowadays had ample fourth dimension to prepare their ain online apps alongside comparable services, together with receive got also had to bring down prices. When Uber increases its prices to to a greater extent than economical levels, traditional taxi companies volition live inward a strong seat to defend their businesses together with struggle back. Many other local together with international ride-hailing competitors receive got also emerged together with replicated Uber's client value proposition. Uber originally had a technological lead, but has at nowadays lost it, together with inward capitalism, it doesn't affair how much you've innovated together with improved the Blue Planet if other people tin john easily re-create you.
Uber also has a real limited 'network' effect, because drivers tin john together with practise bound to whatever platform offers them the best terms - indeed most Uber drivers job all available platforms, together with they receive got rides from the platform offering them the highest rates - together with customers tin john practise the same (most customers receive got multiple ride-hailing apps on the phones, together with tin john easily select the cheapest). This agency that fifty-fifty if Uber survives, it volition probable ever stay an extremely depression margin business.
Uber's vision of beingness the globally dominant build for ride-hailing has also already been quashed. In many markets they were outcompeted past times to a greater extent than nimble together with aggressive local competitors, which has forced Uber to merge and/or teach out many markets (they no longer be inward Singapore/South East Asia, for instance, having been forced to merge alongside local competitor Grab, which is the surviving brand, inward telephone substitution for a minority stake; the same occurred inward Red People's Republic of China alongside Didi). Given this pronounced forced retreat inward the company's global ambitions - essentially the early on adoption of the 'shrink to profitability' strategy mentioned before - it is remarkable the company's individual marketplace seat valuation doubled in ane lawsuit to a greater extent than during this menses - a truthful testament to the extent of the electrical flow VC-funded tech bubble.
Uber tin john belike survive, but it volition probable demand to significantly shrink the size together with breadth of its operations downwards to a few profitable centre niches/markets (a strategy the companionship has already commenced), together with it may ultimately terminate upward beingness worth exclusively a handful of billions of dollars, every bit the companionship operates a depression margin describe organization on a much smaller addressable market, where it also needs to fence alongside many other vigorous competitors, including non exclusively other ride-sharing apps, but also newly-energized traditional taxi companies.
All this is - all the same - before considering the potentially devastating number the arrival of total vehicle autonomy volition receive got on Uber's business. The delusional Masayoshi Son has invested aggressively inward Uber together with sees it every bit purpose of his vision of participating inward the coming technological singularity, but the truth is that Uber belike won't fifty-fifty hold upward the transition to autonomous cars, allow lonely the singularity (the latter of which is also some other delusion, reflecting widespread technological hubris together with "Moore's Curse" - the inappropriate job of the analogy of rising transistor density to typify coming exponential progress inward other areas).
Many many well-resourced organisations are working on developing total vehicle autonomy, together with it is most unlikely Uber volition live the offset past times the post. And whoever develops the engineering scientific discipline offset volition live able to offering a much to a greater extent than affordable fleet of fully-autonomous ride-hailing vehicles, bankrupting human-based ride-sharing platforms. Furthermore, fifty-fifty if Uber did orbit off to live first, longer term at that spot volition live many providers of autonomous fleets operating the same commoditized service, where the exclusively entry barrier is working capital missive of the alphabet (how many cars practise y'all desire to fund into a fleet inward a given location). It's probable to resultant inward an extremely working capital missive of the alphabet intensive, highly competitive together with depression profitability industry.
Furthermore, if your ain individual auto tin john autonomously drive y'all to together with from your destination, together with afterward dropping y'all past times the door, tin john choke together with common itself, at that spot is lilliputian value-add provided past times ride-hailing at all - y'all tin john exactly job your ain car, fifty-fifty if you're intoxicated (the latter characteristic volition probable significantly bring down demand for taxis/ride-hailing, every bit this is a fundamental job case). Why hold off for someone else's car, when y'all tin john teach out at in ane lawsuit inward your own, the model of which y'all tin john select to stand upward for your ain preferences alongside abide by to comfort, style, size, safety, performance, together with cost. Personal cars receive got been used for a real long fourth dimension every bit an seem of personal identity, every bit good every bit to demo off wealth together with status, together with at that spot is a expert remove a opportunity that continues, together with indeed makes a resurgence in ane lawsuit cars are fully autonomous (much has been made of Millennials comprehend of ride-hailing together with eschewing individual vehicle ownership, but a lot of this reflects the high cost of individual vehicle ownership for cash-strapped Millennials, together with the cost together with hassle of obtaining drivers' licenses).
How this all shakes out remains to live seen, but it is far from clear Uber volition hold upward this transition at all (although I tend to believe total autonomy is much farther off than the engineering scientific discipline bulls believe - belike at to the lowest degree a decade). And depending on the stride of development, Uber may non fifty-fifty succeed inward making a turn a profit before this indicate arrives, which agency that it may non succeed inward ever making a profit, period.
Uber is an extraordinary testament to the grade of delusion together with sheer irrationality that currently exists inward the Blue Planet of privately-funded tech. At this point, the extent of the irrational exuberance is real much approaching the grade of the dot.com mania. The post-IPO sell-offs inward Uber together with Lyft volition no uncertainty live ascribed to the 'short sightedness' of populace markets, but the truth is that fifty-fifty inward their electrical flow dry ground of infatuation alongside high-growth tech companies, populace markets are soundless to a greater extent than rational than individual tech markets, together with that is why the stocks are falling. A reckoning is coming inward the individual tech market, together with the rush of tech IPOs this yr suggests the tipping indicate may good live nigh.
Uber looks to live a fairly obvious curt to me.
LT3000